The Suez Canal Drought Imminent And It’s Not Good

The Suez Canal Drought Imminent And It’s Not Good

now it’s one of the world’s most important shipping routes and it’s blocked a giant container ship ran ground in the sewers Canal after losing power and at around 200,000 tons and over 400 m long the container well it’s going to take some shifting 50 ships a day normally passed through the canal carrying 12% of the World’s Trade so the pressure is really on the sez Canal is like a Lifeline for global trade cutting through Egypt to connect the Mediterranean Sea with the Red Sea and by extension Europe with Asia spanning over 193 km it’s a vital route for ships with around 40 cargo vessels passing through every day adding up to a whopping 14,000 ships each year but this crucial Waterway is facing a looming thread of drought that could throw a wrench into the gears of global trade imagine if the Suz Canal dries up what would that mean for the world economy join us as we dive into the history of this iconic canal and explore the potential consequences if it were to run dry Maritime Transportation isn’t just another Cog in the wheel of global Commerce it’s the glue that holds economies cultures and communities together worldwide while air travel has certainly changed the game for getting people and goods from point A to point B the shipping industry Remains the backbone of economic growth and international trade at its core Maritime transportation is all about navigating the vast expanses of our oceans and seas to Ferry everything from everyday items to heavy duty Machinery across the globe it’s like a finely tuned machine with a network of shipping routes ensuring that millions of tons of cargo make it to their destination smoothly and on time every single day just how important is it well according to the international chamber of shipping the shipping industry operates a whopping Fleet of over 50,000 Merchant vessels handling nearly 90% of global trade these ships crisscross the world’s oceans bridging far-flung Shor and making sure that producers can connect with consumers no matter where they are but it’s not just about natural waterways humans have also gotten in on the action by building some pretty impressive artificial canals like the Panama Canal the suas canal and the Grand Canal these Feats of engineering are like super highways for maritime traffic offering faster and more cost-effective routes for ships to navigate between different parts of the world in the world of artificial waterways the p P Canal steals the show as a shining example of human Ingenuity and Engineering Brilliance spanning the narrow strip of land in Panama this man-made Wonder connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans slashing transit times and costs for ships traveling between the America’s East and West coasts then there’s the zuz canal a true strategic gem linking the Mediterranean and Red Seas it’s like a shortcut for ships journeying between Europe Asia and Africa bypassing the long and risky trip around Africa southern tip by taking this route vessels can speed up their voyages and streamline their operations giving Global Supply chains a serious efficiency boost but let’s not forget about other game changers like the vadon canal in Russia and the Corinth canal in Greece these waterways break down Geographic barriers connecting different bodies of water and fostering economic ties across diverse regions and how can we Overlook the Grand Canal of China with a history stretching back over 2,000 years this ancient Marvel has been a Lifeline for trade and cultural exchange throughout China’s imperial past stretching over 1100 miles it links the yellow and yangzi rivers serving as a vital artery for the flow of goods and ideas across the vast expanse of China the Suez Canal stretches 193.3 km it’s a man-made Waterway situated in Egypt linking the Mediterranean Sea to the Gulf of Suz a northern arm of the Red Sea opened officially in November 1869 it stands as one of the busiest shipping routes globally accommodating thousands of vessels annually this canal acts as a vital link separating Asia from Africa and providing the shortest Maritime path between Europe and regions bordering the Indian and Western Pacific Oceans traveling from Europe via the Mediterranean and Red Seas through the Suez Canal shaves around 7,000 km off the journey compared to the longer route through the South Atlantic and Southern Indian oceans it connects Port SED in Northeast Egypt to port tufik in the city of Suz in the South the Suz Canal was constructed between 1859 and 1869 by the Suz Canal company and the Suz Canal Authority owned and maintained the waterway in 2015 Egypt completed a significant expansion of the Suz Canal that saw the deepening of the parts of the canal and the construction of a second 35 km long shipping Lane along part of the main Waterway the expansion allowed the canal to accommodate two-way traffic along part of the route and the transiting of larger vessels in December 2017 the world’s largest container ship the 400 met long o Hong Kong passed through the suest canal carrying 21,400 containers witnessing around 8% of global Seaborn trade annually the canal plays a significant role in the growth of Egypt’s economy according to Reuters the sews Canal generated $5.3 billion in 2017 though the sus Canal wasn’t formerly completed until 1869 there is a long history connecting the Nile river in Egypt and the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea the history of the sus Canal spans approximately 40 Centuries with the idea of linking the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea originating during the era of the Pharaohs of ancient Egypt the concept endured until the construction of the first canal in the region connecting the waters through the Nile River under the reign of sasar II a pharaoh of Egypt despite its construction the canal was often abandoned for many years afterward however it was periodically reopened for navigation under rule of various leaders including City I NCO II persan King Darius Emperor Tran and AMR IB alas among others historical records indicate that the canal underwent extensions and numerous attempts to construct new channels during these periods the first modern endeavor to build a canal occurred in the late 1700s during Napoleon bonap part’s expedition to Egypt Napoleon envisioned that establishing a French controlled channel on the ismos of Suz would disrupt British trade compelling them to either pay dues to France or find alternative routes the idea for Napoleon’s Canal plan emerged in 1799 but an error in measurement revealed that the sea levels between the Mediterranean and the Red Seas were too desperate for the project to be viable leading to an immediate hold in construction however with the emergence of a new Europe and the advancement of industry in Maritime trade entrepreneurs began considering Canal construction a new one proposal aimed to directly link the Red Sea with the Mediterranean offering a shorter route compared to circumnavigating Africa or transporting cargo and passengers across the Suz Peninsula the next Endeavor to construct a canal in the region arose in the mid 1800s when French diplomat and engineer Ferdinand deeps persuaded Egyptian Vice Roy s Pasha to endorse the Canal’s Construction in 1858 the universal Suz ship canal company was established obtaining the right to commence Canal construction and operated for 99 years after which control would revert to the Egyptian government the construction of the Suz Canal officially commenced on April 25th 1859 it was projected that a total of 2 billion 613 million cubic feet of Earth 6 million on land and two billion through dredging would need to be moved for its construction the original estimated cost of the project was 200 million Franks however the decision to build a canal linking the Mediterranean and the Red Sea Drew criticism from Britain who viewed it as a political maneuver to diminish the country’s dominance in Maritime trade British opposition persisted until the Empire purchased a 44% stake in the canal in 1875 following an auction of shares by the Egyptian government due to financial difficulties initially forc laborers were deployed for the construction of the canal thousands of individuals were reportedly coerced into digging the canal using pics and shovels until Pasha prohibited Force labor in 1863 consequently the sez Canal company introduced customade Steam and cold powered shovels and dredgers to facilitate construction with the assistance of this Machinery the project gained the momentum it needed enabling the Waters of the Mediterranean to flow into the Red Sea through the canal on November 17th 1869 when it open for navigation the Suz Canal measured 200 to 300 ft wide at the surface 72 ft wide at the bottom and 25 ft Deep by completion the total cost of the project exceeded twice the original estimate after the completion of the project the sus Canal had a significant impact on World Trade despite the traffic through the Waterway being below expectations in the initial years meanwhile the financial problems linked with the canal construction allowed the British government to buy the stakes own owned by Egyptian interest in 1875 to become the major shareholder in the Suz Canal company the canal was vital to the British economy as it provided a shorter sea route to its colonies and the oil fields of the Persian Gulf Britain strengthened its control over Egypt in 1875 when the latter went bankrupt allowing the Britain strengthened its control over Egypt in 1875 when the ladder went bankrupt allowing the European Banks to take control of the country financially as the French and British continued their control over the country it started resentment among the Egyptians this caused Britain to invade Egypt in 1882 Egypt remained virtually independent due to the anglo-egyptian Treaty of 1936 but Britain took complete control of the Su Canal during the first world war Britain announced Egypt a protectorate and sent forces to protect the canal and this lasted till 1922 when Britain provided nominal Independence to Egypt though the Anglo egyp Egyptian treaty declared Egypt a sovereign state in 1936 Britain only agreed to withdraw its troops from Egypt in 1956 the major political unrest linked to the sus Canal known as the suest crisis started in July 1956 when the then Egyptian president Kamal Abdel Naser nationalized the Suz canal and closed the Straits of Tran the decision resulted in the invasion of Egypt by the UK France and Israel only after the intervention of the United Nations the three forces with Drew from Egypt allowing the country to reopen the canal for commercial shipping however the political unrest continued for a long time and the Egyptian authorities shut down the canal in 1967 during the Six-Day War between Israel and Egypt the Canal’s closing also led to the stranding of 15 shipping vessels in the middle of the canal at the great Bitter Lake these vessels known as yellow Fleet remained trapped until 1975 after Egypt reopened the Suz Canal after peace talks with Israel since then the canal remains a vital transport link between the Mediterranean and Red Seas allowing International ships to avoid the problematic Voyage around the southern tip of Africa according to the sus Canal Authority the world’s longest Canal without a lock expects to raise the daily average of traveling vessels to 97 ships and revenue to 13.22 six billion by 2023 in 2021 around 50 ships traversed the canal daily constituting about 12% of total global trade at the time however much of the Canal’s length is not wide enough to accommodate two ships passing simultaneously necessitating convoys of ships to take turns navigating these sections of the Waterway despite an ongoing Expansion Project significant portions of the canal remain single laned the everg given was constructed on December 25th 2015 launched on the 9th of May in 2018 and completed on the 25th of September 2018 replacing a previous vessel of the same name at the time of the incident it was registered in Panama owned by the Japanese company shoi kisen kaisha leased by the Taiwan based container Shipping Company Evergreen Marine for operation and managed by burnhard schilte ship management All crew members were Indian Nationals and fortunately none sustained injuries during the incident the owner shy kishen Kisha held protection and indemnity liability coverage for $3.1 billion with the mutual UK p&i Club in the Japanese Market furthermore container ships of this magnitude typically carry insurance coverage for hole and Machinery damage ranging from 100 to $40 million prior to the incident the everg given had navigated through the canal on 22 occasions bill kavanau has characterized the passage through the sus Canal as a very complex and high-risk operation wind gusts can cause the stack containers to behave like a sail pushing the heavy vessel off course and its immense momentum complicates recovery efforts the Egyptian government mandates that ships transiting the canal be boarded by an Egyptian Suz crew which includes one or more official Maritime pilots from Egypt Suz Canal Authority these Pilots assumed command of the ship taking over from the regular crew and the captain at the time of the accident there were two Egyptian SCA pilots on board on the 23rd of March 2021 The Vessel ever given was on route from tanang ppas Malaysia to the port of roddam Netherlands while traversing the Suz Canal it was part of a Northbound Convoy fifth in line with 15 vessels following behind at 7:40 Egypt local time the ship encountered a sandstorm with strong winds exceeding 40 knots these winds caused the ship to lose its ability to steer leading to a deviation in its course consequently The Vessel ran ground at the 151 km mark from Port SED on the Mediterranean Sea approximately 10 kilomet from Suz port on the Gulf of Suz near the village of Manet rugola the ship became lodged sideways blocking the canal in both directions fortunately the crew comprised entirely of Indian Nationals were all safe and no injuries were reported an analysis of data from ship tracking websites by ever later head of the maritime technology division at the University of gent suggests that the bank effect which may cause the stern of a ship to swing towards the near Bank in constricted waterways could have played a role in the grounding additionally lateral forces from west to east winds pushing sideways against the Northbound ship may have also contributed modern ship design primarily focuses on efficiency and stability at Sea leaving the effects of hydrodynamics in Shallow Waters relatively unstudied especially considering the increasing size of ships in recent years over 300 vessels at both ends of the canal were obstructed by the everg given including five other container ships of similar size 41 bulk containers and 24 crude oil tankers the affected vessels represented approximately 16.9 million tons of dead weight some ships were docked at ports and anchorages in the sea While others remained stationary the disruption also affected the everg given sister ship ever greet along with two Russian Navy vessels the staya class Corvette stoi and the alai class Oiler Cola these two military vessels which were conducting Naval exercises in the vicinity at the time were among the few affected by the blockage earlier that day Cola had been involved in a minor collision with a bulk carrier Arc Royal and both ships remained anchored approximately 11 km apart throughout the incident on March 25th the sez Canal Authority halted navigation through the canal until the Aiven could be refloated Egyptian president abdal fat LCC seport adviser anticipated the Canal’s clearance within 48 72 hours maximum on the same day the sca Enlisted the the Dutch company Royal boskalis Westminster via its subsidiary Smith Salvage to oversee Marine Salvage operations Peter bosski chief executive of balis noted that such an operation can take days to weeks on March 26th the sea accepted an offer from the United States Navy assessment team of dredging experts to assistant ship removal bosal’s team collaborated with the canal Authority overseeing a Workforce comprising Egyptian Dutch and Japanese workers over a dozen tugboats were assembled to tow and push the ship along with suction dredgers to clear sand and silt from beneath her bow and Stern high-capacity pumps were deployed to manage the weight of fuel oil and water ballast on the ship contingency plans considered unloading the 18,300 teu of 15 ton containers using large floating cranes or heavy lifting helicopters but this was deemed impractical and hazardous to begin vessels were repositioned to clear space for the refloating operation Fuel and 9,000 tons of ballast water were removed to lighten the ship while an excavator began digging out the Bow by the following day the canal Authority reported that dredging operations were nearly 87% complete on March 27th a high tide allowed a small ftill of tugboats to join the efforts to refloat the ship Yuko hiaki president of shoy kisen Kisha stated the ship is not taking water once it ref Flats it should be able to operate by 1800 UT DC the ship had shifted North by 17 M over 300 ships faced delays near the canal with others still on Route and some redirected to Alternative paths even after the everg given was freed ongoing delays were anticipated due to potential congestion at ports Osama rabi chairman of the Suz Canal Authority stated in a press conference that adverse weather conditions were not the primary cause of the ship’s grounding he suggested that technical or human errors may have been involved and assured that old factors would undergo investigation on March 28th efforts to dislodge the ship progressed allowing some movement of the stern and Rudder during high tide rubby expressed the possibility of the ship sliding and moving at any time expressing hope that unloading containers wouldn’t be necessary despite challenging recovery conditions caused by strong tides and winds the Egyptian president abdal fat LCC ordered preliminary preparations for lightening the ship’s cargo additionally the seagoing tug alpg guard boasting a Ballard pull of 285 tons arrived that morning significantly increasing towing capacity on the 29th of March the stern of the everg given was refloated at 4:30 local time with the arrival of a second seagoing tug the Italian Carlo Magno boasting a Ballard pool of 153 tons increased towing capacity further ballast adjustments were made and towing operations were timed to coincide with the ebbing king tide of the super moon tidle flow at at 1505 local time the ship was successfully pulled free subsequently The Vessel was towed to the great Bitter Lake for inspection following a search of the canal bottom and soil the canal was reopened to shipping from 1900 local time at that point over 400 ships were waiting roughly 200 in the Red Sea under 200 in the Mediterranean Sea and around 50 in the bitter Lakes on March 31st with the everg anchored in the great Bitter Lake divers and investigator from the sus Canal Authority commenced inspections for damage and began questioning the crew to determine the causes of the grounding the backlog of ships delayed by the blockage was finally cleared by the 3rd of April in June 2021 the SE Canal Authority reported that one person had died during the Six-Day Salvage operation during the days when the canal was blocked the challenges of rescuing larger ships were underscored salvaging such vessels demands additional time and Equipment if the everg given had necessitated the use of floating cranes to remove some containers the process would have required larger equipment operating for an extended period potentially prolonging the blockage by days or even weeks the SE Canal faces a wide range of challenges that impact its Operation Safety and efficiency these challenges range from Natural Factors such as sedimentation and water level fluctuations to human induced issues like accidents geopolitical tensions and security threats understanding these challenges is crucial for stakeholders involved in Maritime trade and for policy makers tasked with ensuring the Canal’s continued reliability and sustainability one of the most pressing challenges facing the suas canal is the risk of accidents and blockages the Canal’s narrow width and high traffic volume make it susceptible to collisions and groundings which can disrupt global trade and have far-reaching Economic Consequences the recent incident involving the container ship ever given which ran a ground and blocked the canal for 6 days in March 20 21 underscored the potential impact of such accidents the incident led to a massive traffic jam delaying thousands of ships and costing billions of dollars in Lost Revenue preventing similar accidents in the future requires improved safety measures enhanced navigation protocols and greater cooperation between the sez Canal Authority and shipping companies in addition to accidents the sez Canal faces challenges related to maintenance and dredging the canal requires regular dredging to remove sediment and maintain an adequate depth for ships to pass through safely however sedimentation is an ongoing issue exacerbated by factors such as erosion siltation and changes in water flow dredging operations are costly and timec consuming requiring significant investment and resources from the sca failure to address sedimentation effectively can lead to decreased navigability increased transit times and higher operating costs for shipping companies geopolitical tensions in the region also POS a risk to the sus Canal’s operation and security the canal passes through Egypt a country that has experienced political instability and unrest in recent years any disruption in Egypt’s stability could potentially impact the Canal’s operation leading to delays and uncertainty for maritime trade moreover the canal strategic location makes it a target for terrorist attacks and other security threats while the sea Works closely with International Partners to ensure the canal security the threat of terrorism and piracy in the region remains a concern for shipping companies and governments alike furthermore environmental concerns such as climate change and sea level rise present long-term challenges for the Suz Canal rising sea levels could increase the risk of coastal erosion and flooding threatening the Canal’s infrastructure and disrupting its operations additionally changes in weather patterns and water flow could affect sedimentation rates and water levels further complicating dredging efforts and navigation if the SU canect were to dry up it would have significant implications for Global Maritime trade Regional economies and geopolitical Dynamics the Canal’s closure would disrupt the flow of goods between Europe and Asia forcing ships to take longer and more costly routes to reach their destinations one immediate consequence of the canal drying up would be the rerouting of Maritime traffic ships traveling between the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea would be forced to take alternative routes such as sailing around the southern tip of Africa or using the Northern sea route through the Arctic these routes are longer more treacherous and often require additional fuel consumption resulting in higher shipping costs and longer transit times the closure of the sus Canal would also have a profound impact on Regional economies particularly those that rely heavily on Maritime trade countries bordering the Mediterranean and Red Seas such as Egypt Israel Saudi Arabia and Greece would experience disruptions to their shipping Industries leading to job losses reduced revenues and economic downturns ports along the canal route would see a decline in traffic and revenue affecting businesses that rely on Maritime trade for their livelihoods furthermore the drying up of the Suz Canal could exacerbate existing geopolitical tensions in the region the Canal’s closure would disrupt Supply chains and energy flows leading to potential conflicts over resources and trade routes countries that depend on the canal for the transit of oil and gas such as Saudi Arabia Iran and Russia would be particularly affected leading to increased competition for alternative routes and energy sources in response to the drying up of the Suez Canal efforts would likely be made to restore the Waterway to its former State this could involve dredging operations to remove sediment and increase water depth as well as the construction of dams or reservoirs to replenish water levels however such efforts would require significant investment time and resources and may not fully restore the Canal’s fun functionality or ecological Integrity but what are your thoughts on this please let us know in the comment section below and stay tuned for more content

The Suez Canal is like a lifeline for global trade, cutting through Egypt to connect the Mediterranean Sea with the Red Sea, and by extension, Europe with Asia.
For copyright matters please contact us at: thespacewindtv@gmail.com