Mark Zuckerberg is ‘almost ready’ to reveal a prototype that left early testers ‘giddy’

    https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-zuckerberg-meta-ar-holographic-glasses-prototype-2024-6

    Posted by 69sean

    29 Comments

    1. left them giddy as in left them with VR motion sickness? ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4258)

    2. rockandrollmonster on

      is his firmware getting an update so he seems more like a real human being?

    3. I did one of those VR demos at the store with the Meta Quest 3. Just looking at the demo for 10 seconds started making me feel sick.

    4. HungryShare494 on

      wtf is with teasing the day where you tease the event where you tease the official launch of a product? Ship it or zip it

    5. Finally the Zuck cloned himself ![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271)![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271)![img](emote|t5_2th52|4271)

    6. steppinrazor2009 on

      He’s actually talking about prototype AR glasses that are generations ahead of anything out now. The prototype itself is pretty damn awesome, honestly. Not what’s going to be released, but it was the version we used to learn what works and doesn’t.

      I’ve been called out before for talking too much about internal products on social media, so I can’t go into specifics, but honestly just wait and see.

    7. His company is so shit, instagram is currently advertising here in the Netherlands how ‘good’ their protection of minors is because profiles created by 13 year olds are put on ‘private’ by default.

    8. Affectionate-Desk888 on

      I’ve made good money on meta stock. If y’all tards actually cared about making money instead of burning it on gay DD then you’d be wise to listen

    9. upside_win111 on

      Y’all can hate on zuck but it’s always WSB that gets cucked. If it’s one thing I’ve learned here it’s that you NEVER bet against musk or zuck no matter how much you dislike them.

    10. discombobulantics on

      “Every person that works for me or was paid by me to test it absolutely loves it!!!!” You don’t say

    11. Unlucky-Prize on

      He’s spent tens of billions on a product looking for an audience and a problem, in the most inefficient way imaginable, which usually means senior vice presidents managing a bunch of vps managing a hunch of directors who manage 3 people doing work, giving you an average cost per maker of tens of millions per year. I’m only slightly exaggerating. Why would we think that just becuase a limited test excited people this isn’t exactly more of the same? Very skeptical.

    Leave A Reply
    Share via