26 Comments

    1. Fetlocks_Glistening on

      “Well, *on paper* it might look like we’re insolvent, but we have every confidence…”

    2. WestTexasCrude on

      What does this mean. Charles Schwab is the most concerning… for… reasons….

    3. HungryLikeTheVVolf on

      If only Peter Sullivan was here to explain it to us what this means.

    4. politicki_komesar on

      “…And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

      3rd president of US in letter to J. Taylor

    5. Pasting the key part of the article below to save you all some time.

      Also some commentary is that this might seem like big numbers but as the article alludes to it’s just unrealized treasury holding losses. Yes this could be like Silicon Valley bank, or it could be just normal stuff that solves itself over time. If you believe that rate cuts will happen, and these banks have enough access to working capital, then this is a nothing burger. If you trade treasuries you know that if you can hold it to maturity then there is no losses, that’s the key part. (Granted those four small banks might fail, they don’t have the same access to capital).

      > ”
      > Four banks had losses that exceeded their equity capital: Union City SVGS Bank, where unbooked losses equaled 172.7%; Citizens ST Bank, where unbooked losses equaled 121.4%; Green Dot Bank, where unbooked losses equaled 108.6%; and First America TR, where unbooked losses equaled 104%.

      > Larger banks on the list with more than $10 billion in equity had unbooked security losses more than their equity capital: Charles Schwab, where unbooked losses equaled 64%; USAA Federal Savings Bank, where unbooked losses equaled 67% of their equity capital; and Bank of America NA, where unbooked losses equaled 58%.
      > “

    6. NotCoolFool on

      I like the “close up of a bank” picture with a building with “Bank” written on it 🤣

    7. EuroPoor-NoodleLover on

      You see , in 10-20 years they can be solvent again , let’s just hope in that time people won’t decide to withdraw their money and force the banks to realize the uppermentioned losses.
      The balance in nature is such a fragile think it’s almost beautiful
      (Insert little girl smiling at burning house here) 🏠🔥👧🏼

    8. LoneStarDev on

      > Larger banks on the list with more than $10 billion in equity had unbooked security losses more than their equity capital:

      – Charles Schwab, where unbooked losses equaled 64%;
      – USAA Federal Savings Bank, where unbooked losses equaled 67% of their equity capital; and
      – Bank of America NA, where unbooked losses equaled 58%.

    9. This is related to securities – how the banks have invested – has nothing to do with how much money they are making… which is waaaaaaaaay more

    10. dadscallion on

      Isn’t really an issue unless they have a need to sell. They just let time eat away at these unrealized losses.

    11. This article is very troubling. Looks like more bank issues on the horizon

    12. Magicalsandwichpress on

      Most likely long end T-bonds from before interest rate hikes, if they can ride it out for another 5 years they’d be ok ( assuming it’s all 10 years). Let’s just hope no liquidity crunch, coz that market does not move. The only silver lining is there is big pile sitting in reverse repo and treasury is buying some back to provide further liquidity, but you gotta be desperate to be taking the hit now.

    13. Every other BofA has their ATMs CLOSED in my area. Went to a city 50 minutes north of me a few months back – same shit there too.

      **about time to go puts on XLF**

    Leave A Reply
    Share via