3 TOP GOLD STOCKS IN 2024 – Adrian Day

    Today I have the pleasure to chat with Adrian Day.
    He’s one of the sharpest minds in the business.
    We’re going to be talking about gold and silver
    stocks today, and he’s a wealth of knowledge.
    He’s been managing money in the sector for decades.
    He’s one of the smartest people out there.
    So I highly recommend that you listen
    carefully to what he has to say.
    Thanks for joining me today, Adrian.
    Well, thank you very much for asking me today.
    I want to talk to you about precious metals.
    Where are you finding the best value
    in the precious metal sector today?
    Well, of course, that begs the
    question that I am finding value. Sure.
    Yes, your assumption is correct.
    I am finding value.
    I’ll answer the question about value, but I’ll change the
    question a little bit, if I may, and say, where
    do I think the best place to be buying right
    now is? At the beginning of a bull market
    The senior stocks, the large miners, the large
    royalty companies, they will always move first.
    They will always move before the juniors,
    the intermediates, juniors, the explorers, unless those
    smaller companies have something company specific.
    And so at this point in the cycle, frankly,
    when the large cap stocks, despite the move that
    we’ve had in the last six weeks, the large
    cap stocks are still very undervalued.
    They’re very under-owned.
    You know, I think that’s the place where people should
    be putting most of their money for the time being.
    And not only are those the first to
    move, but another important consideration is the larger
    companies are also the more certain to move.
    And by that, I mean if you bought, I’ll
    just say, you know, I’m not saying I like
    these, but just if you bought Newmont, Barrick, Agnico,
    Franco and Wheaton, I can pretty much guarantee you,
    As much as the SEC allows me to
    guarantee anything, I can pretty much guarantee you
    That if gold goes to 2500, those five
    stocks are all going to go up.
    Whereas if you buy Consolidated Moose, Pasture and Amalgamated Ajax
    and so on, they may or may not go up.
    So the big cap stocks are the first
    to move and a more sudden to move.
    So I would focus at this point more of
    the money in the large cap stocks. Now, and
    that’s both the miners and the royalty companies.
    But you know what?
    There’s some astonishing values among the
    juniors and the exploration companies.
    I just think you have to be a lot more selective.
    The smaller the company, the lower down the food chain
    you go, the more selective you have to be.
    And one of the things that I would be
    really focused on at this point with the smaller
    companies, apart from all the normal stuff.
    But one of the things I would
    really focus on is the balance sheet.
    And it’s not just how much money
    they have, but what’s the Runway.
    How much time do they have with that
    current balance, current cash, before they would need
    to go out and raise more money?
    So they either have to have a strong balance sheet,
    lots of cash, or they have to have… and no
    debt, or they have to have cash flow.
    And some juniors do have cash flow. Or they
    at least have to have ready access to capital.
    Some companies can always raise money.
    I mean, in a bad market, they have to pay
    a little more, but they can always raise money.
    But there are other companies.
    But if the market tightens, they simply won’t
    be able to raise money at all.
    So you need to make sure that the
    company has a runway and that they’re good
    for, I would say, at least 18 months. At least.
    Okay, excellent.
    You mentioned starting with the biggest companies, so I
    remember you being pretty bullish on Franco Nevada after
    the whole Cobre Panama fiasco a few months back.
    I was looking at the gold price when that
    happened and at the share price when that happened.
    And back in late October, this was before the mine
    totally got shut down, but there was bad news coming
    out, and this was before it started crashing. Right.
    And then the gold price was $2,007,
    and the share price was $138.
    Today, the gold price is over 2300,
    and the share price is $119.
    So the gold price is up about 15%, and at the
    same time, the share price is down 17% from there.
    So do you still think that’s a good value? Sure, No,
    Absolutely!
    I mean, the thing you’ve got to remember is
    that Cobre Panama represented 19%, almost 20% of their
    revenue and 15%, 16% of their NAV.
    So when 16% of your NAV just gets
    taken away from you, it does two things.
    First of all, and remember, Franco’s
    trading at three times NAV.
    So, arguably, if you lose 15% of your NAV,
    if you lose, you know, the stock should be
    down three times what your NAV is, because the
    stocks trading is three times NAV.
    But when you lose…
    When you lose your largest asset, you lose not only
    the revenue, but you also lose a certain amount of
    credibility, because up until that point, I think it’s fair
    to say that Franco was a company that even since
    going back into the eighties, before they merged and then
    unmerged with Newmont, they had a reputation for sort of
    never putting a foot wrong.
    You could argue this wasn’t their fault.
    But nonetheless, people say, well,
    where was your due diligence?
    How come you put so much of your
    money into this mine, et cetera, et cetera?
    So there’s a little bit of credibility,
    particularly with generalists, that are lost.
    But no, I mean, I think when you look
    at Franco right now, if you look at Franco
    right now, you’ve got a company, certainly great management,
    but you’ve got a company with a rock solid
    balance sheet, 1.4 billion in cash, no debt.
    They’ve also got access to a line of credit.
    So they have a total of 2.5 billion, 2.4
    billion in available credit, but 1.4 billion in cash.
    They’ve got revenue from over 100 different
    assets, including the oil and gas assets,
    and no single mine at the moment.
    Now, they’ve written Cobre Panama off.
    They’ve written it off completely,
    As you know. No single asset represents
    more than 15% of their NAV.
    But most of them, there’s three of them that are
    over 10%, and then you go down under 10%.
    In fact, it’s very well diversified.
    But truth is, Franco, even when Cobre
    Panama was up and running, Franco was
    more diversified from both Wheaton and Royal Gold.
    It’s just that they had the bad
    luck of having their mind shut down.
    And the thing to remember with the royalties, of
    course, is that they’re not the operators.
    So they are really limited as to what they can do.
    When Panama was negotiating the First Quantum, they were
    really limited in what they could do, how they
    could influence those negotiations, other than putting pressure on
    First Quantum to do this or to do that.
    So, yeah, so I think it’s an extremely strong company.
    And the other thing I’ll end on, which
    is critical, they’ve written Cobre Panama off completely.
    They are assuming zero income from Cobre Panama
    this year, which, remember, was their largest asset.
    But even without Cobre Panama, their GEOs gold equivalent
    ounces, their production, if you like, is actually going
    to go up this year, even without Cobre Panama.
    And so I’m not trying to dismiss or
    diminish how important Cobre Panama was and still
    is, but the truth is, the company is
    growing, continues to grow, even without Cobre Panama,
    which is pretty astonishing when you think.
    Yeah, for sure.
    And you mentioned them trading at
    a significant premium to NAV.
    I know they are relative to what the analysts
    say the NAV is, but I would argue that
    the analysts are calculating the NAV wrong, because the analysts,
    number one, they don’t take into account an increasing
    commodity price over the years.
    And over the years, the commodity price tends to go up.
    And number two, they don’t take into account
    the expansions that aren’t planned at these mines.
    And when you have these super long life mines
    like Franco Nevada has and they’re low cost mines,
    well, those tend to expand over time.
    So do you think that maybe it’s not so
    much that they trade at such a high premium,
    but rather that the analysts calculate the NAV wrong?
    No, I think you make a good point.
    And I think the analysts calculate NAV wrong for all
    of the mining companies, because if you use NPV
    eight or something, you’re basically putting zero value on
    anything that’s more than twelve years out.
    And that’s just not reality for the mining business.
    But I think it’s particularly important, as you
    say, it’s particularly important with Franco because Franco
    tends most of their big streams other than
    the gold strike royalty that they have, Barrick’s
    gold strike, their very first gold royalty that
    they bought back in 1983 or 1984.
    But other than that one, all of their
    big assets are streams and most of them
    are gold byproduct streams on copper mines.
    And the copper mines are 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 years long.
    So one can debate and argue how much value
    should I… how much should I pay today for
    revenue 80 years old, 80 years into the future?
    But I would argue it should be
    a little bit more than zero.
    And certainly if you’re talking 30 years,
    it should be more than zero.
    And yet the analyst’s net asset values
    put zero on that kind of revenue. Sure. Right.
    You said twelve years out, you’re getting zero value.
    I mean, today it’s 2024.
    Let’s rewind twelve years and pretend we’re
    in 2012 years out is today.
    Are we supposed to say that in 2012
    they were supposed to assign zero value, zero
    to the revenue we’re getting today, this year?
    I think if you look at it, it diminishes very,
    very rapidly after ten years on an NPV8.
    And yeah, you’re right.
    I mean, it’s worth something.
    I mean, the question is, is a mine that’s only going
    to last ten years, everything else being equal, production being
    equal, is a mine that’s going to last ten years worth
    less than a mine that’s going to worth 30 years?
    Last 30 years?
    Of course it is.
    Of course it is.
    And the NPV model simply
    doesn’t take that into account.
    So I think you’re right, Franco, and
    this is true of Wheaton as well.
    Wheaton’s mines tend to be very, very long
    life as well, although the duration on Franco
    is longer than wheaton, longer than Royal, the
    other two big royalty companies.
    So I’m not afraid of the
    valuations of which these things trade.
    I think there’s a reason that they trade
    at high valuations or supposed high valuations, including,
    frankly, cash flow, because they have the upside
    without additional cost, whereas a mining company has
    the upside, but they also have the costs.
    And as we all know, sometimes when the price of gold
    moves up, so does the price of all of your costs.
    And your margins actually get squeezed
    with a higher gold price.
    Whereas the royalty companies, without having to pay
    the costs, they get the full benefit, or
    their streams, not necessarily the full benefit.
    The stream costs can adjust, but they get
    certainly most of the benefit of the upside.
    So, yeah, they deserve to trade.
    They should trade at higher cash flow multiples.
    I think it’d be really good for Franco shareholders
    if Barrick Gold got their hands on Cobre Panama,
    because I don’t think there’s anyone better on earth
    to get that back into production than Mark Bristow.
    Have you heard anything more through
    the grapevine, through your contacts?
    No. Bristow.
    Well, first of all, Bristow, as
    you know, doesn’t like to overpay.
    He doesn’t like to overpay.
    I think Barrick would be the perfect company to
    take over all of First Quantum, frankly, because most
    of First Quantum is in Panama and in Africa.
    And Bristow, you know, he is african, south
    African, he’s african and he’s got a very
    long, long record of successful operation in Africa.
    So I think Barrick’s the obvious candidate.
    The problem is he doesn’t like to overpay.
    I think you have to pay a premium.
    If you want to buy a big company,
    you’ve just got to pay a premium.
    And the other thing, frankly, is
    he doesn’t like to overpay.
    But as he says, we don’t need to overpay because
    we’ve got such a lot on our plates anyway.
    And if you look at the Riko Diq in Pakistan,
    you could hardly find a more risky jurisdiction, of course.
    But if you look at that, that’s going to keep
    the company going for another 40 years or something.
    So they don’t need to make a
    big acquisition, but they would be perfect.
    The problem with the stream, as you
    know, royalties are normally on the ground,
    so it doesn’t matter who’s operating it.
    It doesn’t matter if there’s a change of government.
    Unless the communists take over,
    you’ve still got your royalty. It’s on the ground.
    A stream is with the company.
    And typically, when a company does a
    stream with, let’s say, with Barrick.
    Let’s say Royal Gold did one on Pascua Lama.
    Well, you have a backstop of collecting some, not
    necessarily all, but some of the, some of the
    gold you were expecting from Pascua Lama.
    You have a backstop from all of Barrick’s operations.
    And so even if the mine, in the case of
    Pascua Lama doesn’t come into production, you’re still getting some
    kind of revenue from other mines that the company owns.
    In the case of First Quantum, well, First Quantum, first
    of all, wouldn’t do it, and they couldn’t really do
    it because they had no other gold anywhere.
    You know, their mines in, in Zambia are pure copper mines,
    so there was no way for Franco to get a backstop.
    So there is no backstop.
    So the problem is, First Quantum were to sell their
    assets on a friendly or unfriendly, but were to sell
    the assets to another company, they would have to include,
    they would have to include Franco Stream with the sale
    or Franco is just going to sue them.
    The worst happens, and Panama were to confiscate the
    mine and sell it to someone else or do
    an auction, then that stream would not follow.
    So that’s the big risk there.
    I don’t think that’s going to happen.
    I mean, Panama’s actions here were not
    good, which is an English understatement.
    But I mean, Panama is not
    like, it’s not like North Korea.
    They’re not going to confiscate the
    mine, I don’t think, without compensation.
    So the question is open.
    Is first quantum going to get it back up
    and running, or is First Quantum going to sell
    it to someone else who then comes in and
    probably has an easier chance negotiating with the government
    and gets it back up and running.
    But the First Quantum would have
    to sell Franco stream with it. Sure.
    And even if none of that happens,
    well, then there’s a pretty good chance
    that Franco recovers something in court.
    But that might take a while. Sure. Yeah. Worst case?
    Yeah. Yeah.
    No, all the lawyers I’ve talked to
    say, based on what we know, they
    would definitely win in an international arbitration.
    The question is, a, it takes a long time, as
    you said, and b, once you get an arbitration award,
    you then got to recover the assets, which a Panamanian
    government is probably unlikely to just hand over.
    So you have to capture a Panamanian aircraft when
    it lands in Colombia, and you’ve got to capture
    a Panamanian ship when it’s sailing through the Caribbean.
    That kind of stuff takes time.
    Besides the majors, are there any other
    specific companies that you really like today?
    Yeah, well, I like to look at companies.
    Well, I like to look at a lot of different
    ways, but one of the things I do look at
    is great companies with great management that have what I
    think is a temporary decline in the price.
    So you look at a company like B2Gold, for example.
    B2Gold is a great company.
    They’re great operators.
    They’ve got a solid balance
    sheet, million or something.
    They pay a dividend that’s around 6% right now.
    So it’s one of the highest, if not
    the highest, in the gold mining business.
    They are very, very good
    mine builders and mine operators.
    They have a very, very strong record of
    building and operating mines and also in community
    relations, because they’ve worked in some pretty, pretty
    difficult places over the years.
    So the stock is down at the moment for two reasons.
    One is because they bought Sabina’s Sabina mining,
    which I probably call Goose Bay, up in
    the Yukon, which near the Arctic Circle.
    So b two is building that mine.
    And any time a company is building a
    major mine, the stock price is always weak.
    We saw that with Equinox building greenstone, which
    is in Ontario, not in the Arctic Circle.
    But it always hurts the stock price when you’re
    in process of building a mine, because when you’re
    building a mine, things can only go wrong.
    You very rarely have pleasant, pleasant
    surprises when you’re building a mine.
    Maybe you finish on time, on
    budget, but that’s what people expect.
    So it’s not a surprise.
    I mean, it is a surprise, but you know what I mean.
    Sure.
    So, anyway, it’s down because
    they’re building a new mine.
    And if they’re building a mine in,
    let’s face it, a difficult, difficult area.
    You know, the Arctic Circle can.
    The cold can affect equipment.
    Equipment can freeze and break and so on.
    And then, of course, more recently,
    they’ve had the issues in Mali.
    Mali is where their largest mine is,
    Fekola represents about 27% of their NAV.
    So it’s significant to the company.
    And, you know, Mali, the military took over.
    There’s no elections.
    And, you know, I think their view
    in mining business as a cash cow.
    So they had an audit of all the mining companies.
    They’re looking at revamping the mining code.
    And then just recently, there’s been a
    report in the canadian global mail that
    they’re looking at nationalizing Barrick’s
    big gold mine there.
    And that’s really hurt all of
    the companies operating in Mali.
    But I think whatever happens, the
    company will come out of that.
    I mean, even if worst case…
    Worst case, they lose Fekola.
    You know, they’ve got other things in
    the hopper that they can accelerate.
    So I like that one.
    I won’t be so long on the others.
    I like some of the junior explorers
    again, that either have strong balance sheets.
    Midland will be one.
    It has a very strong balance sheet of about $8 million.
    It has,
    Don’t quote me on the numbers, but it
    has joint ventures, active joint ventures with about
    eight different companies, including Rio and BHP.
    So, you know, good solid companies.
    And then down from there, Soquem and so on.
    So they have a lot.
    It’s a prospect generator.
    So they have a lot of active projects with
    senior companies have good balance, a strong balance sheet.
    And they’re in Quebec, great jurisdiction.
    So I like that model.
    Another one I like is a company called Orogen.
    Orogen is a royalty generator.
    They’ve changed the name to a royalty generator.
    They’ll go out and generate projects.
    So the same as a prospect generator.
    But instead of, you know, having someone earn in over
    time and keeping 50% and keeping 30%, they will sell
    100% of a project in return for a decent royalty.
    And right now they’ve got $18.5 million
    in cash, a super strong balance sheet.
    And they’ve got positive cash flow from a royalty
    that they have Ermitaño, which is first majestic.
    First majestic has the central Santa Elena mine in Mexico.
    And then most of the ore going through that mill
    now is coming from the adjacent deposit, which is called
    ermitaño which Orogen owns a royalty on.
    So they’re getting…
    So they’ve got a strong balance sheet.
    They’re getting positive cash flow.
    But in addition to that they own a 1%
    royalty on Anglo Gold’s new discovery down in southern
    Nevada at the bottom of the Beaty trend.
    Well, sorry, bottom of the Walker Lane trend.
    The town’s called Beaty and they own a 1% on two
    of the deposits in that sort of district, Silicon and Merlin,
    which right now contain over 13 million ounces of gold.
    So that won’t come on stream probably
    until 2028 and probably even after that.
    But Ermitano is going to last until then.
    So if a company’s going to have, you
    know, God willing and the mule don’t die,
    they’re going to have cash flow all the
    way through to when Silicon and Merlin come on.
    And the truth is they will probably get
    an offer from one of the senior mining
    companies in the meantime that they can’t resist.
    Regarding b2gold, based on my analysis, basically you
    buy all of the assets in the company at a
    fair value and you get the Mali assets for free.
    You get Fekola for free.
    So yeah, there’s major problems there, but I feel
    more comfortable with BTG because of that discount.
    And you mentioned that they’re building a
    mine up in the arctic Circle, but
    that management team has done that before.
    They did that in Russia, if I remember right.
    Well, no, absolutely.
    That was not B2, of course.
    But it was the same team. You’re right. Right.
    Same management team.
    Yeah, no, good point.
    I should have mentioned that.
    No, you’re absolutely right.
    And that’s what I love.
    Now look, there’s no question, there’s no question that if
    the Mali government sends their troops into Fekola to seize
    the mine and kick out all the expats and maybe
    put a few of them in jail just for icing
    on a cake, there’s no question that in the short
    term the stock price will come down.
    Theres no question about that. But I agree.
    No, you raise a good point fundamentally,
    and thats what I love fundamentally.
    If they lost it, just lost it.
    Its still a good company with upside. Sure.
    The company in a way that first, in
    a way that Cobre Panama potentially could destroy
    first quantum, because first quantum has debt.
    That’s a problem.
    Whereas, whereas B2, you know, they do have
    debt to build, build goose bay, but debt is offset.
    They don’t have net debt.
    Mali does concern me, though.
    In January of this year, the government nationalized
    the largest artisanal mine in the country.
    Now, an artisanal mine probably isn’t giving the
    government the revenue that the Barrick mine or
    the b2gold mine is giving.
    So it makes more sense that would be
    the first one they would nationalize. But also
    something not directly related to mining.
    On April 10, the Malian government
    banned political parties and groups.
    And then the following day, on April 11, the
    government banned media from reporting on political matters.
    So I don’t like the direction that that’s going.
    And so there’s definitely some concerns there for me.
    Absolutely.
    And as you know, also they have russian troops in
    the country, you know, the Wagner group that was, you
    know, pretty vicious in Ukraine, a sort of unofficial arm
    of the US, of the russian government.
    Well, they were, they were in, in Mali and
    basically, you know, just in cahoots with the government.
    So, yeah, no, it’s not, it’s not a
    good place and it’s not getting better.
    We’re going to get right back to the interview, but I
    wanted to ask you to subscribe to the channel if you
    would like to see more from Adrian Day because this is
    part one of this interview and in a day or two,
    part two is going to be released.
    So be sure to subscribe to the channel
    so you don’t miss that part two.
    And if you’re interested in Adrian’s
    services, he offers a money management
    service and the global analyst newsletter.
    If either one of those sounds appealing to
    you, go to adrianday.com to learn more.
    And you also mentioned that you really like Orogen.
    I love how careful they are with their spending.
    Theyre super careful with their G&A.
    In addition to being a cash flowing
    company, thats still a small company.
    Do you have any idea of how much
    they could sell their silicon royalty for?
    I know its growing like crazy and has grown
    a lot in the last twelve or 24 months.
    Yeah, no, that’s a good question.
    I’m not as sort of optimistic or as maybe some people.
    I think it’s going to continue to grow, but
    of course with all these things, there’s a sort
    of optimal time to try to sell something.
    And right now you’ve got 13.2 million oz.
    It has grown dramatically.
    Everybody assumes it’s going to continue to grow.
    So to me this is the optimal time to do it.
    When the blue sky is still there, you certainly want
    to sell it before they start doing a PEA and
    putting, you know, engineering around it and so on.
    So I think right now I think this will be a
    very, very, I’m just going through my thinking on this.
    This will be a very, very attractive asset for
    any of the major major gold royalty companies because
    first of all, it’s a royalty which is obviously
    better than stream in terms of cash flow.
    It’s a royalty.
    And also it’s got anglo gold, which is
    a major mining company and it’s in Nevada.
    So this will be an asset that all of them would want.
    So I think there’ll be a
    bidding war is what I’m saying.
    And as we know in these bidding wars,
    sometimes things get grossly overpriced or arguably overpriced.
    I mean, we can think of examples from a couple of
    years ago where, let’s say Royal Gold would buy Great Bear
    and then Royal Gold bought the second Cortez royalty.
    And I’m reliably informed that on the Cortes, they
    were bidding at least 25% more than the second
    highest bidder, who already was 20% above everyone else.
    So in a bidding war, in an auction
    situation, you can get some crazy prices.
    Having said all that, Orogen right
    now is trading a little bit…
    So I was looking at it on a price per share
    basis, if you’ll excuse me doing that, I was thinking they
    could probably get $1.10-$1.15 for silicon.
    But that’s on the assumption that everything else, the
    cash, the Ermitano royalty, and then all of the
    other exploration they have, is spun out.
    So that will put a value, you know, 17 million
    plus Ermitano is probably worth 35 to 40 million US.
    And by my calculation, and then
    everything else, maybe 5 million.
    You know, the 17. Sorry.
    The 18 and a half (million dollars) is canadian,
    so let’s say 15 there, 40.
    You know, you’re talking.
    You’re talking 55 to 60 million extra on
    top of whatever someone buys silicon orogen for.
    So I think that would be, you know, we
    wouldn’t get a huge premium, but when you consider
    everything to spun out, they’d buy the company and
    spin everything else out for tax reasons.
    When you consider the value of everything that would be
    spun out, I think it’d be a very attractive.
    A very attractive offer.
    And the other thing to remember about this. Yeah.
    This is not a ten for one or anything
    like that, but the downside is as low as
    you could possibly have in the junior space. Sure.
    And it’s all about the risk reward, right? Yeah. Yeah.
    I wanted to ask you about Equinox’s purchase
    of Orion’s 40% of the Greenstone mine.
    When I first saw that number, I was a
    little shocked at that price tag, $995 million.
    I was like, wow, they’re paying almost a
    billion dollars for 40% of that mine.
    And Orion’s portion, if I remember
    right, has Sandstorm stream attached to
    that, whereas Equinox’s portion does not.
    I did some quick back of the napkin math
    here, and Equinox is guiding $890/oz AISC
    after reaching commercial production on their 60% portion.
    And then sandstorm stream on
    Orions adds about $110/oz. to that.
    So that’d be about $1,000 per ounce.
    That would put the annual annual cash from operations
    for that 160,000oz for that 40% at $212 million,
    which is a payback period of 4.69 years.
    And then you have a 16 year mine life to start.
    So although that number looked pretty big when I
    first glanced at it, doing some quick math, I’m
    actually thinking that it looks like a pretty good
    purchase price, especially considering the upside there.
    Sure.
    Yeah, no, I agree.
    I’m not sure about the.
    I’ll just take your word on the Sandstorm royalty, that
    it covers the Orion part, not the other part. Sorry.
    So I’m just… Stream rather. Because again that could
    be, streams are done with companies, not with mines.
    I’m just saying I don’t know.
    Yeah, when I first saw that
    I thought boy that’s expensive.
    But yeah, the more I think about it, I think not.
    And I think Equinox is right to try to buy it
    now before weve got a years worth of production and maybe
    the gold price is up but a years worth of production
    which shows everybody, wow, this really is a good mine.
    We knew it was but it really is.
    I think it clearly makes sense for Equinox
    to want to buy the whole thing.
    So yeah, so on reflection, its not quite as
    expensive as it first appears.
    They’re raising money as you know they’re raising money
    at a reasonably good price given where their stock
    price has been for the last six months.
    So the dilution is not as bad as lets say could be.
    Another thing I dont like to be honest is a lot
    of this is it 30% of it is in Equinox shares.
    I think its 700 (million) and something they get in
    cash and the rest is in Equinox shares.
    Maybe 20% in Equinox shares.
    Equinox is not a company I’m completely on
    top of as you can see tell.
    But Orion, I mean there’s obviously going to
    be some lockups in those shares but Orion
    is not in the business of holding shares
    in other people’s companies for the long term.
    So they will be an opportunistic seller.
    So that is a bit of an overhang on the market. Sure.
    And the market clearly didn’t like it.
    It was down eight or 9% today, if I
    remember right, or if I last I saw.
    But at the same time, that purchase is
    improving the political risk profile of Equinox.
    It’s getting it, it just got it to about a
    million ounce producer because in 2024, equinox’s other mines are
    set to produce 590,000oz at the midpoint of guidance.
    And then after greenstone is
    in full production, that’s another 400,000 oz.
    That’s 990,000 oz, which basically gets them to that million
    ounce mark. Almost to the million, aren’t they? Yeah.
    And also it improves their cost profile a lot.
    No that’s, I’ve made two comments if I may.
    I’m not sure I completely agree with you on
    the first part about the stock price coming down.
    You know, when you look at
    Equinox, it was yesterday was what? 550?
    At 550, I think.
    Let me just pull it up so we can
    get, since it’ll only take me a second.
    We may as well.
    So, yesterday, it closed at, oh, 570. Sorry. Yeah.
    So it closed at 572, but the offering
    is a 530, and it’s now a 524.
    So it’s not unusual when a
    company does an overnight offering. Right.
    It’s not unusual for the stock price to
    go right down to where that price is.
    And it’s also, I would say, it’s normal for them to
    go down to where the stock price is, and it’s not
    unusual for them to go a little bit under.
    So to go only $0.06 under.
    I’m not surprised at that at all, frankly, especially if, when
    you look at Equinox for the last sort of month.
    I’m just pulling it up. Sorry.
    So we have the exact numbers.
    You go back one month from today, and you’re basically
    at the same price we were a month ago.
    So I don’t think this is extreme, to be honest.
    I think your second point is very valid, though,
    because they’ve got the Brazil mines, they’ve got the
    California mines, moderately small, both of them, and then
    they’ve got the Los Filos, which is
    in Guerrero state, as you know.
    And they’ve had all the problems there, and
    they have to redo the mine plan, which
    essentially means laying off a lot of workers.
    So, you know, there is a sort of.
    There’s a question mark over that.
    They want the workers to,
    All of them, all of the villages, all of the groups,
    they want to sign on to the new mining plan, because
    there’s no point in, you know, having a new plan and
    then, you know, having continued blockades and so on.
    So this now having 100% of greenstone, not only is
    Greenstone a great mine in a great jurisdiction, which it
    is, but it also gives them a little bit of
    whatever you want to use leverage in negotiations, because now
    they can say, look, we’ve got another mine.
    We don’t actually need you.
    We only need you if you cooperate.
    Sure, sure.
    And in fairness, they’re all in sustaining costs
    ex-greenstone are atrocious.
    They’re well north of $1,800 an ounce, but with
    owning 100% of greenstone, that brings it down closer
    to $1450 (per ounce), which is much more respectable.
    Yeah, it’s not exactly low, but it’s much, much better.
    Yeah.
    No, no, you’re absolutely right.
    You’ve hit the nail on the head. For the company
    It really changes their dynamic and their
    profile, and it allows them flexibility.
    It allows them flexibility with Los
    Filos in the negotiations, but it also
    allows them flexibility with California.
    If there’s permitting issues or all sorts of things,
    they don’t have to be in such urgency to
    get these other things up and running.
    Yeah, and they do have a lot of debt.
    They had something like 900 million in debt before
    this and they just add another 500 million.
    And most of that is around 9% interest rate.
    So that is a significant interest payment.
    However, after greenstone is in full production, based on
    my numbers, they should have a cash from operations
    So I don’t see that being a problem.
    Well, I hope they’re going to make it clear to the
    market that they intend cutting debt with the cash flow.
    Cutting debt aggressively with the cash flow, because you’re
    absolutely right in that last raise they did back
    in September was something that the market was not
    expecting because they had told the market they had
    all the money they needed to finish building Greenstone.
    And in September they came
    out and did that convertible, right?
    It was a convertible (debt) back in
    September, which really shocked the market.
    And the stock crashed at that point, or I don’t
    think crashed as an exaggeration, but went down a lot
    at that point because people were not expecting that.
    So, yeah, I think that’s an important thing for them to
    get the debt under control, but I think they will.
    Now, Greenstone’s up and running, as you say, they’re
    almost at a million, so they don’t need to
    go out and buy anything or build it.
    You know, they don’t need to
    go out and buy anything else at this point.

    Mining stock expert and industry veteran, Adrian Day, joins me today to chat about his favorite gold stocks in 2024.
    Get my newsletter: https://miningstockmonkey.com/products/vip

    In this video we chat about the major gold miners and gold royalty companies such as Franco Nevada (FNV), Barrick Gold (GOLD), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Royal Gold (RGLD), and Newmont Mining (NEM).

    In addition to the majors, Adrian tells me about a few other companies he’s really bullish on in 2024 such as B2Gold, Midland Exploration, Orogen Royalties.

    We chat about the risks that B2Gold faces in Mali as well as their new Goose mine that they’re building in Canada. We talk about how much Orogen Royalties could sell their Nevada “Silicon” royalty for. And we chat about Equinox’s purchase of the remaining 40% of the Greenstone mine that they just finished building in Ontario, Canada. Did they get a good price or did they overpay. In this interview we discuss the pros and cons.

    Never make any investment decisions based on my videos. This sector is very risky and this should not be considered investment advice. Always do a lot of your own research before investing your hard earned money.

    0:00 – Intro
    0:20 – Best value in the precious metals stocks
    2:20 – What to look for in the junior stocks
    3:30 – Still bullish on Franco Nevada?
    7:44 – Do gold analysts get the NAV wrong?
    11:44 – Barrick Gold buying First Quantun?
    13:00 – The problem with the Cobre Panama stream
    15:13 – FNV’s chances against Panama in court
    15:54 – Adrian’s favorite stocks today
    16:14 – B2Gold (BTG)
    18:50 – Midland Exploration
    19:28 – Orogen Royalties
    21:17 – Pros and Cons with BTG
    22:55 – Problems with mining in Mali
    24:29 – Potential sale price of Orogen’s “Silicon” royalty
    28:12 – Equinox Gold buys 40% of Greenstone Mine
    36:33 – Mining Stock Monkey VIP newsletter

    This sector is very risky and what we talk about in this video should not be taken as a recommendation to buy or sell any security. It is very important that you always do a lot of your own research before investing any of your money.

    #miningstocks #goldstocks #adrianday

    38 Comments

    1. Thanks for this, it was awesome! I have to say, I watched your B2Gold video and as informative as it was, you left the risk of the Mali mine being seized. I think that was a biggie and should have been mentioned.

    2. I don't understand his arithmetic at 4:55 about Franco Nevada's NAV. If the market cap is and remains 3x NAV, a 15% loss of NAV (Cobre Panama's loss) translates into a 15% loss (not 45%) in market cap. Same percentage.

    3. Huge thanks for the video! I like Adrian Day's point of view although he's not fond of development stocks, which have a high potential of performing provided you do the work to chose the good ones. I don't agree when he says people expect on time, on budget : stock price is generally low when they announce construction decision so there is a lot of upside even if something happens. I own all the stocks you mentionned among my 70+ stocks except Barrick and Newmont. Btw if Barrick buys First Quantum or Cobre Panama, which Mark Bristow didn't just want, there is a serious risk of a huge sell off for Barrick. Midland is interesting: it's like playing darts with 30 darts. If you're interested in that kind of stocks there are also Kenorland with the best potential to me and Mundoro.
      PS: Unless diversified, I won't invest in Mali, China, South Africa, Bolivia, DRC, California, Sudan, Venezuela, North Korea, Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe. And Israel also but that's for personal reasons

    4. Great Video as usual! What do You think of K92, this company seems to be a hidden Gem, incredibly low AISC huge reserves and growth potential. have been trading the stock for 3 Years but looking at all numbers its a long Term play as well!
      Thanks

    5. To consider your newsletter, it would be useful to know your industry relevant bio, please
      Reference to your travel & relationship youtube channel not necessary

      Thank you

    6. It's mind boggling to me that people don't look at the context when doing subtitles. In the context it's obvious that he said "they had the bad luck of having their mine shut down", not " their mind shut down".

    7. good guy, but from someone whos traded commodities and miners a long time, all I can say is stick with the big boys like Barrick, Newmont and Agnico. BTG only has Clive left, the brains have left the company.

    8. Great Interview. What is your take about the news from 26.04 about acquisition of Adventus Mining? Would you like to create a video about SilverCorp? We all know that you are shareholder and I have watched your both videos wit Adventus CIO. Great job!

    9. I agree with Day that discounting future royalty streams at 8% per annum is over-conservative. However, this does not value receipts 12 into the future at “essentially zero”. Rather, the valuation factor drops to 36% — quite a long way from 0%.

    Leave A Reply
    Share via